[PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread r...@ozmun.us
--- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ .\ (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF .\ THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. .\ -.Dd $Mdocdate: November 17 2012 $

Re: [PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:14PM -0600, r...@ozmun.us wrote: --- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - this diff doesn;t apply cleanly. is your mailer mangling spaces or something? jmc

Re: [PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread Ryan Ozmun
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:14PM -0600, r...@ozmun.us wrote: --- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - this diff doesn;t apply cleanly. is your mailer mangling spaces or something? jmc

Re: [PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 07:40:19PM -0600, Ryan Ozmun wrote: On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:14PM -0600, r...@ozmun.us wrote: --- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - this diff doesn;t