On 2015-07-23, Michael McConville mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu wrote:
--- sbin/dump/main.c23 May 2015 05:17:20 - 1.56
+++ sbin/dump/main.c15 Jun 2015 23:16:10 -
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
usage();
obsolete(argc,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:17:12PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 2015-07-23, Michael McConville mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu wrote:
--- sbin/dump/main.c23 May 2015 05:17:20 - 1.56
+++ sbin/dump/main.c15 Jun 2015 23:16:10 -
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ main(int
On 2015-07-24 19:15, Michael McConville wrote:
I removed it because I wasn't sure whether the project liked placebo
legacy flags. Should I replace it?
For reference: When -U was removed it was removed.
http://marc.info/?t=14280712873r=1w=2
Tim.
On 2015-07-23, Michael McConville mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu wrote:
--- sbin/dump/main.c 23 May 2015 05:17:20 - 1.56
+++ sbin/dump/main.c 15 Jun 2015 23:16:10 -
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
usage();
obsolete(argc, argv);
-
On 07/25/15 01:46, trondd wrote:
On 2015-07-24 19:15, Michael McConville wrote:
I removed it because I wasn't sure whether the project liked placebo
legacy flags. Should I replace it?
For reference: When -U was removed it was removed.
Compared to -a, which we've had since -97, -U was a
ping
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=143432732005608w=2
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=143441062327954w=2
Index: sbin/dump/dump.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/dump/dump.8,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u