Re: [patch] Remove archaic manual sizing from dump(8)

2015-07-26 Thread Theo de Raadt
On 2015-07-23, Michael McConville mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu wrote: --- sbin/dump/main.c23 May 2015 05:17:20 - 1.56 +++ sbin/dump/main.c15 Jun 2015 23:16:10 - @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) usage(); obsolete(argc,

Re: [patch] Remove archaic manual sizing from dump(8)

2015-07-24 Thread Michael McConville
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:17:12PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2015-07-23, Michael McConville mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu wrote: --- sbin/dump/main.c23 May 2015 05:17:20 - 1.56 +++ sbin/dump/main.c15 Jun 2015 23:16:10 - @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ main(int

Re: [patch] Remove archaic manual sizing from dump(8)

2015-07-24 Thread trondd
On 2015-07-24 19:15, Michael McConville wrote: I removed it because I wasn't sure whether the project liked placebo legacy flags. Should I replace it? For reference: When -U was removed it was removed. http://marc.info/?t=14280712873r=1w=2 Tim.

Re: [patch] Remove archaic manual sizing from dump(8)

2015-07-24 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2015-07-23, Michael McConville mmcco...@sccs.swarthmore.edu wrote: --- sbin/dump/main.c 23 May 2015 05:17:20 - 1.56 +++ sbin/dump/main.c 15 Jun 2015 23:16:10 - @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) usage(); obsolete(argc, argv); -

Re: [patch] Remove archaic manual sizing from dump(8)

2015-07-24 Thread Alexander Hall
On 07/25/15 01:46, trondd wrote: On 2015-07-24 19:15, Michael McConville wrote: I removed it because I wasn't sure whether the project liked placebo legacy flags. Should I replace it? For reference: When -U was removed it was removed. Compared to -a, which we've had since -97, -U was a

[patch] Remove archaic manual sizing from dump(8)

2015-07-23 Thread Michael McConville
ping https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=143432732005608w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=143441062327954w=2 Index: sbin/dump/dump.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/dump/dump.8,v retrieving revision 1.49 diff -u