Hi,
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> I was reading through the code for less/filename.c and noticed that the
> calling for seek_filesize() in filesize() is superfluous? A wild guess
> is that it's remains from when BAD_LSEEK was removed?
There is more that is use
...and a third bump, this time we're actually out of beta for real. ;-)
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:19:16AM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Shameless bump, now when we're out of beta. :-)
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was reading through th
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:19:16AM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> > Shameless bump, now when we're out of beta. :-)
>
> being out of beta means we're in release mode..
Oh! Of course, silly me. Apologize for the noise.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:19:16AM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Shameless bump, now when we're out of beta. :-)
being out of beta means we're in release mode..
Shameless bump, now when we're out of beta. :-)
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was reading through the code for less/filename.c and noticed that the
> calling for seek_filesize() in filesize() is superfluous? A wild guess
> is that it's remains fro
Hi all,
I was reading through the code for less/filename.c and noticed that the
calling for seek_filesize() in filesize() is superfluous? A wild guess
is that it's remains from when BAD_LSEEK was removed?
Jesper Wallin
Index: usr.bin/less/filename.c
===
