Re: [please test] acpi: more *sleep(9) -> *sleep_nsec(9) conversions

2020-12-21 Thread Greg Steuck
Paul Irofti writes: > I think Scott should split his diff in two so people can test which > part breaks suspend-resume. Can you try reverting the dsdt.c bits and > leaving the acpiec part of the diff in your tree and see if suspend is > still broken? Reverting dsdt.c and applying acpiec.c part

Re: [please test] acpi: more *sleep(9) -> *sleep_nsec(9) conversions

2020-12-21 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:23:25 -0600 > From: Scott Cheloha > > Short version: > > Please test if this patch breaks suspend or hibernate on your > machine. Reply with the results of your test and your dmesg. > > Both are still working on my Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 6. > > Long

Re: [please test] acpi: more *sleep(9) -> *sleep_nsec(9) conversions

2020-12-21 Thread Paul Irofti
I think Scott should split his diff in two so people can test which part breaks suspend-resume. Can you try reverting the dsdt.c bits and leaving the acpiec part of the diff in your tree and see if suspend is still broken? Paul

Re: [please test] acpi: more *sleep(9) -> *sleep_nsec(9) conversions

2020-12-20 Thread Greg Steuck
Scott Cheloha writes: > Short version: > > Please test if this patch breaks suspend or hibernate on your > machine. Reply with the results of your test and your dmesg. > > Both are still working on my Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 6. This breaks resume from zzz on HP EliteBook 840 G1. The

[please test] acpi: more *sleep(9) -> *sleep_nsec(9) conversions

2020-12-20 Thread Scott Cheloha
Short version: Please test if this patch breaks suspend or hibernate on your machine. Reply with the results of your test and your dmesg. Both are still working on my Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 6. Long version: This patch converts the remaining tick sleeps in dev/acpi to nanosecond sleeps.