Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Sebastian Benoit(be...@openbsd.org) on 2020.06.29 16:18:03 +0200: > Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2020.06.26 14:45:53 +0200: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2020.06.26 14:45:53 +0200: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > improve. I

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Uwe Werler
rev 0x78, msi > iwm0: hw rev 0x230, fw ver 34.0.1, address 60:f6:77:bc:3a:04 > > (mode 11g: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.620/0.844/1.101/0.153 Mbps) > > mbk Uwe > > > On 26 Jun 14:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-29 Thread Uwe Werler
ling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > improve. If you have time to run before/after performance mea

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Jesper Wallin
Tested on a "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 9260" rev 0x29, msix (hw rev 0x320, fw ver 34.3125811985.0) I seem to be getting "iwm0: fatal firmware error" a few seconds after the 4-way handshake. I can send a few packets, so it sure connects and all, but then it fails shortly after. iwm0: begin

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Denis Fondras
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 7260" rev 0x73, msi AP is Zyxel USG40W Before : bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 9.800/14.000/14.2

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Tracey Emery
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > impro

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Johan Huldtgren
On 2020-06-26 20:11, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > hello, > > On 2020-06-26 14:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > It would be great to get at least one test for all the chipsets the driver > > supports: 7260, 7265, 3160, 3165, 3168, 8260, 8265, 9260, 9560 > > The behaviour of the access point also matters

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Tobias Heider
Works for me on a 7260. [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-27 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 06:14:48PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Mike Larkin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:01:03PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > &g

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Mike Larkin
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > impro

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, On 2020-06-26 14:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > It would be great to get at least one test for all the chipsets the driver > supports: 7260, 7265, 3160, 3165, 3168, 8260, 8265, 9260, 9560 > The behaviour of the access point also matters a great deal. It won't > hurt to test the same chipset

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Todd Carson
This is from an 8265: iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265" rev 0x88, msi iwm0: hw rev 0x230, fw ver 34.0.1, Associated to an Apple AirPort AP on a 5 GHz channel. Before: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 11.402/17.410/36.190/4.079 Mbps After: bandwidth

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). > > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi > as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially > impro

Re: 11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Florian Obser
Seems to be working on a X1 gen2 using iwm0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Dual Band Wireless AC 7260" rev 0x83, msi against a Unifi AP-SHD. Before: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 7.344/9.077/11.514/0.803 Mbps after: bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 12.551/65.407/82.835/14.169 Mbps -- I'm

11n Tx aggregation for iwm(4)

2020-06-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4). Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially improve. If you have time to run before/after performance measurements with tcpbench