> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:21:43 +1000
> From: Jonathan Gray
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >
> > We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not
> > being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those.
> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:03:10 +0200
>
> We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not
> being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those. The diff below
> also adds the also missing ENOTRECOVERABLE and
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not
> being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those. The diff below
> also adds the also missing ENOTRECOVERABLE and EOWNERDEAD.
>
> Thoughts?
We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not
being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those. The diff below
also adds the also missing ENOTRECOVERABLE and EOWNERDEAD.
Thoughts?
(Dunno if there is a point describing verbosely what those new errno
values mean on