Re: Additional errno values

2017-04-10 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:21:43 +1000 > From: Jonathan Gray > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > > We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not > > being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those.

Re: Additional errno values

2017-04-10 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas > Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:03:10 +0200 > > We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not > being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those. The diff below > also adds the also missing ENOTRECOVERABLE and

Re: Additional errno values

2017-04-10 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not > being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those. The diff below > also adds the also missing ENOTRECOVERABLE and EOWNERDEAD. > > Thoughts?

Additional errno values

2017-04-10 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
We have a bunch of patches in ports to deal with EPROTO and EBADMSG not being defined. It would be nice to get rid of those. The diff below also adds the also missing ENOTRECOVERABLE and EOWNERDEAD. Thoughts? (Dunno if there is a point describing verbosely what those new errno values mean on