Re: Call for testing: IPsec diff (update)

2010-07-09 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote: --- net/if_bridge.c 2 Jul 2010 02:40:16 - 1.181 +++ net/if_bridge.c 3 Jul 2010 17:22:52 - @@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ u_int8_t bridge_filterrule(struct brl_he struct mbuf

Re: Call for testing: IPsec diff (update)

2010-07-07 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote: --- net/if_bridge.c 2 Jul 2010 02:40:16 - 1.181 +++ net/if_bridge.c 3 Jul 2010 17:22:52 - @@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ u_int8_t bridge_filterrule(struct brl_he struct mbuf *bridge_filter(struct bridge_softc *, int, struct ifnet *, struct

Re: Call for testing: IPsec diff (update)

2010-07-03 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 10:49:52PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: I need people to test the following IPsec diff on existing setups running -current. This diff will add some cool features for the next release but I first need regression testing with plain old setups (ipsec.conf with static keying

Call for testing: IPsec diff

2010-07-02 Thread Reyk Floeter
Hi! I need people to test the following IPsec diff on existing setups running -current. This diff will add some cool features for the next release but I first need regression testing with plain old setups (ipsec.conf with static keying or isakmpd); preferrably on IPsecs that are running closely

Re: Call for testing: IPsec diff

2010-07-02 Thread Reyk Floeter
Hi, updating one side should be enough. reyk On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 01:15:50AM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote: 2010/7/3 Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org: Hi! I need people to test the following IPsec diff on existing setups running -current. ??This diff will add some cool features for the