Re: Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-02-11 Thread Kurt Miller
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 3:49:34 am Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:35:13 -0500 From: Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com * Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de [2013-01-24 13:03:43]: I think it's dubious that we match the CPU brand name for this at all.

Re: Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-01-30 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:35:13 -0500 From: Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com * Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de [2013-01-24 13:03:43]: Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com wrote: --- sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c.orig 2013-01-14 22:23:43.0 + +++

Re: Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-01-30 Thread Matt Dainty
* Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl [2013-01-30 03:49:45]: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:35:13 -0500 From: Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com * Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de [2013-01-24 13:03:43]: Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com wrote: ---

Re: Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-01-29 Thread Matt Dainty
* Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de [2013-01-24 13:03:43]: Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com wrote: --- sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c.orig2013-01-14 22:23:43.0 + +++ sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c 2013-01-14 22:33:21.0 + @@ -506,7 +506,8 @@

Re: Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-01-24 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Matt Dainty m...@bodgit-n-scarper.com wrote: --- sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c.orig 2013-01-14 22:23:43.0 + +++ sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c 2013-01-14 22:33:21.0 + @@ -506,7 +506,8 @@ if (ci-ci_feature_sefflags SEFF0EBX_SMAP)

Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-01-14 Thread Matt Dainty
The following patch fixes the the detection of the on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx CPUs (and possibly other Atom CPUs). The code was only matching processors where the model began with Intel but this Atom CPU model begins with Genuine Intel so I've updated the logic to match. Now I get: #