Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-09 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Bob Beck > Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:58:03 -0700 > > Since I can't think of a sane reason to check this and care in any > script, yes, kill it. Unfortunately you can't apply your rules about sanity to this thing called autoconf.

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-08 Thread Daniel Dickman
you're missing at least the removal of the flag in the standards section of the man page. I agree with deraadt though, this needs a check of ports. > On Dec 8, 2015, at 12:06 AM, Michael McConville wrote: > > It's been 0.9 since the original import in 2003... > > > Index:

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/12/08 13:22, Marc Espie wrote: > Keep the version, whatever it is. > > The "check of ports" is annoying, because some of these checks may be in > scripts and happen at runtime for ports. > > The way it usually happens is: > something breaks -> porters don't have time to check too closely

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-08 Thread Ted Unangst
Michael McConville wrote: > It's been 0.9 since the original import in 2003... note we also have --mmap for the sole purpose of compat. i'd say keep it. anything that *does* check the version will get a number it doesn't like and then do something "sensible".

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-08 Thread Marc Espie
Keep the version, whatever it is. The "check of ports" is annoying, because some of these checks may be in scripts and happen at runtime for ports. The way it usually happens is: something breaks -> porters don't have time to check too closely -> someone moves the ports to using gnu grep

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-07 Thread Bob Beck
Since I can't think of a sane reason to check this and care in any script, yes, kill it. ok beck@ On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Michael McConville wrote: > It's been 0.9 since the original import in 2003... > > > Index: grep.1 >

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-07 Thread Michael McConville
Bob Beck wrote: > Since I can't think of a sane reason to check this and care in any > script, yes, kill it. > ok beck@ Theo pointed out that there may be ports that check the version. I was considering that too. However, we haven't bumped from 0.9 since 2003. ggrep is now on 2.22, so I have hope

Re: Does grep need a version?

2015-12-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Bob Beck wrote: > > Since I can't think of a sane reason to check this and care in any > > script, yes, kill it. > > ok beck@ > > Theo pointed out that there may be ports that check the version. I was > considering that too. However, we haven't bumped from 0.9 since 2003. > ggrep is now on

Does grep need a version?

2015-12-07 Thread Michael McConville
It's been 0.9 since the original import in 2003... Index: grep.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/grep/grep.1,v retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -p -r1.43 grep.1 --- grep.1 13 Jan 2015 04:45:34 - 1.43 +++ grep.1 8