On 22/11/13(Fri) 08:42, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I tried the old version (I'm using igmpproxy on my firewall and have native
> multicast over pppoe), no problems, but I haven't carefully read the diff yet.
Thanks, I also got positive feedbacks from weerd@ who tested IPv6
Neighbor Discovery, so i
On 22 November 2013 09:26, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 18/11/13(Mon) 11:43, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> Diff below changes the way protocol multicast addresses are linked to
>> an interface.
>>
>> Right now they are added to a list attached to the first protocol
>> address of an interface. That mak
I tried the old version (I'm using igmpproxy on my firewall and have native
multicast over pppoe), no problems, but I haven't carefully read the diff yet.
On 18/11/13(Mon) 11:43, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below changes the way protocol multicast addresses are linked to
> an interface.
>
> Right now they are added to a list attached to the first protocol
> address of an interface. That makes this address descriptor and
> its position in the glo
On 18/11/13(Mon) 12:54, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot nolizard.org> writes:
>
> > -1803,8 +1651,12 in6_delmulti(struct in6_multi
> *in6m)
>
>
>
> > + s = splsoftnet();
> > + TAILQ_REMOVE(&ifp->if_maddrlist, &in6m->in6m_ifma, ifma_list);
> > +
Martin Pieuchot nolizard.org> writes:
> -1803,8 +1651,12 in6_delmulti(struct in6_multi
*in6m)
> + s = splsoftnet();
> + TAILQ_REMOVE(&ifp->if_maddrlist, &in6m->in6m_ifma, ifma_list);
> + splx(s);
> +
> free(in6m, M_IPMADDR);
> }
Diff below changes the way protocol multicast addresses are linked to
an interface.
Right now they are added to a list attached to the first protocol
address of an interface. That makes this address descriptor and
its position in the global list special. Plus in the IPv6 case,
a special kludge
