On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:33:53 -0700
"Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> I think that's really gross.
>
> route domains are a concept usable by some people, not everyone should
> need to see this.
Ah, may be yes. I am using sshd on routing domain other than 0, but
actually I'll add "RDomain 0" to sshd_confi
I think that's really gross.
route domains are a concept usable by some people, not everyone should
need to see this.
> I think rc.d should specify the routing domain explicitly when it
> executes the daemon program even if the daemon's rtable is configured
> 0 since the executed routing domain m
Hi!
I think rc.d should specify the routing domain explicitly when it
executes the daemon program even if the daemon's rtable is configured
0 since the executed routing domain may not be 0.
Exmaple:
(run sshd on rtable 100)
$ doas ifconfig lo100 rdomain 100 127.0.0.1/8
$ doas ln -s sshd /e
