On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:06:12AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Now that rtrequest1(9) properly set RTF_UP when a route is added,
> there's no need to pass it to rt_ifa_add(9).
>
> rt_ifa_del(9) never needed it, but it has been set for documentation.
>
> ok?
Yes, go for it. OK claudio@
>
Now that rtrequest1(9) properly set RTF_UP when a route is added,
there's no need to pass it to rt_ifa_add(9).
rt_ifa_del(9) never needed it, but it has been set for documentation.
ok?
Index: net/route.c
===
RCS file:
