Re: Fix running ldd against multiple shared objects

2011-06-24 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > Diff below fixes "ldd /usr/lib/*.so.*" so that it outputs more than > just the first shared object's dependencies, like the behavior from > "ldd /usr/bin/*". > > The issue is that dlopen(f, RTLD_TRACE) calls exit() after it's done. > I looke

Re: Fix running ldd against multiple shared objects

2011-04-30 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> hi. i have commented out the -x stuff for now, and removed it from > usage(). the rest of your diff is for other people though, so i'll leave > it there. > > jmc It isn't my diff, its from matthew@. I just diffed on top of it. thanks

Re: Fix running ldd against multiple shared objects

2011-04-29 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:26:35PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > Diff below fixes "ldd /usr/lib/*.so.*" so that it outputs more than > > just the first shared object's dependencies, like the behavior from > > "ldd /usr/bin/*". > > > > The issue is that dlopen(f, RTLD_TRACE) calls exit() after it

Re: Fix running ldd against multiple shared objects

2011-04-28 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Diff below fixes "ldd /usr/lib/*.so.*" so that it outputs more than > just the first shared object's dependencies, like the behavior from > "ldd /usr/bin/*". > > The issue is that dlopen(f, RTLD_TRACE) calls exit() after it's done. > I looked into changing this to properly cleanup and return, bu

Fix running ldd against multiple shared objects

2011-04-08 Thread Matthew Dempsky
Diff below fixes "ldd /usr/lib/*.so.*" so that it outputs more than just the first shared object's dependencies, like the behavior from "ldd /usr/bin/*". The issue is that dlopen(f, RTLD_TRACE) calls exit() after it's done. I looked into changing this to properly cleanup and return, but figured it