On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:54:40PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Alexander Bluhm writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> IP_MINTTL also benefits from this. Do we want to list SOCK_STREAM and
> >> SOCK_DRAM here, or use more generic
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> IP_MINTTL also benefits from this. Do we want to list SOCK_STREAM and
>> SOCK_DRAM here, or use more generic language?
>
> We should mention that it only works for TCP and UDP. This is the
> i
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> IP_MINTTL also benefits from this. Do we want to list SOCK_STREAM and
> SOCK_DRAM here, or use more generic language?
We should mention that it only works for TCP and UDP. This is the
ip(4) man page so naming the protoco
Renato Westphal writes:
> 2016-06-27 19:01 GMT-03:00 Alexander Bluhm :
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:08PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>>> Alexander Bluhm writes:
>>> > The man page says IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT is only for unicast packets.
>>> > The ugly part of the code is dealing with
2016-06-27 20:30 GMT-03:00 Jeremie Courreges-Anglas :
> Renato Westphal writes:
>
>> 2016-06-27 19:01 GMT-03:00 Alexander Bluhm :
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:08PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> The man page says IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT is only for uni
Renato Westphal writes:
> 2016-06-27 19:01 GMT-03:00 Alexander Bluhm :
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:08PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>>> Alexander Bluhm writes:
>>> > The man page says IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT is only for unicast packets.
>>> > The ugly part of the code is dealing with
2016-06-27 19:01 GMT-03:00 Alexander Bluhm :
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:08PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>> Alexander Bluhm writes:
>> > The man page says IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT is only for unicast packets.
>> > The ugly part of the code is dealing with multicast packets.
>>
>> IIUC R
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:08PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
> Alexander Bluhm writes:
> > The man page says IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT is only for unicast packets.
> > The ugly part of the code is dealing with multicast packets.
>
> IIUC Renato also needs multicast support. I thought it w
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 08:46:12PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>>
>> Renato would like to implement GTSM in ldpd(8), the first step would be
>> to support IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT on SOCK_DGRAM sockets. The following diff
>> seems to work fine for him.
>>
>> I did
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 08:46:12PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Renato would like to implement GTSM in ldpd(8), the first step would be
> to support IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT on SOCK_DGRAM sockets. The following diff
> seems to work fine for him.
>
> I did not go down all possible *_input()
Renato would like to implement GTSM in ldpd(8), the first step would be
to support IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT on SOCK_DGRAM sockets. The following diff
seems to work fine for him.
I did not go down all possible *_input() methods, only regular TCP and
UDP sockets. Is that enough to deserve the associated
11 matches
Mail list logo