Re: Less strict requirement for USB_REQUEST ioctl

2015-08-10 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 30/07/15(Thu) 12:18, Ludovic Coues wrote: Right now, an USB_REQUEST ioctl will fail with an EBADF error if done on a device opened as read-only. With this patch, the ioctl will fail only if the USB_REQUEST is a write request. Do you need this to be able to use your usbdevs-like tool as a

Re: Less strict requirement for USB_REQUEST ioctl

2015-08-10 Thread Mark Kettenis
ludovic coues schreef op 2015-08-10 23:29: 2015-08-10 22:56 GMT+02:00 Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org: On 30/07/15(Thu) 12:18, Ludovic Coues wrote: Right now, an USB_REQUEST ioctl will fail with an EBADF error if done on a device opened as read-only. With this patch, the ioctl will fail only

Re: Less strict requirement for USB_REQUEST ioctl

2015-08-10 Thread ludovic coues
2015-08-10 22:56 GMT+02:00 Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org: On 30/07/15(Thu) 12:18, Ludovic Coues wrote: Right now, an USB_REQUEST ioctl will fail with an EBADF error if done on a device opened as read-only. With this patch, the ioctl will fail only if the USB_REQUEST is a write request. Do

Re: Less strict requirement for USB_REQUEST ioctl

2015-08-10 Thread Theo de Raadt
ludovic coues schreef op 2015-08-10 23:29: 2015-08-10 22:56 GMT+02:00 Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org: On 30/07/15(Thu) 12:18, Ludovic Coues wrote: Right now, an USB_REQUEST ioctl will fail with an EBADF error if done on a device opened as read-only. With this patch, the ioctl will fail

Less strict requirement for USB_REQUEST ioctl

2015-07-30 Thread Ludovic Coues
Right now, an USB_REQUEST ioctl will fail with an EBADF error if done on a device opened as read-only. With this patch, the ioctl will fail only if the USB_REQUEST is a write request. Index: sys/dev/usb/usb.c === RCS file: