Juuso Lapinlampi partyvan.eu> writes:
> > - * These parameters control when the driver calls the routine to reclaim
> > - * transmit descriptors.
> > + * Thise parameter controls the minimum number of available transmit
> > + * descriptors needed before we attempt transmission of a packet.
> >
> /*
> - * These parameters control when the driver calls the routine to reclaim
> - * transmit descriptors.
> + * Thise parameter controls the minimum number of available transmit
> + * descriptors needed before we attempt transmission of a packet.
> */
There seems to be a typo in there. s/Thi
Hi David and tech@,
I just tried the patch on a December 28 snapshot and got a watchdog
timeout while running iperf. Just the snapshot without the patch
survives iperf without a timeout.
The device in question is this one:
em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82583V" rev 0x00: msi, addres
On 31.12.2015. 15:08, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 03:41:24PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> So Mark and I spent some time to figure out what the issue was with ix(4)
>> based on that info I resurected the em(4) mpsafe diff that got backed out
>> and I applied the same fix. It is s
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 12:08:53AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> [...]
> tests? ok?
> [...]
I'll test it tonight in my hackerspace. There's never a better time for
testing network patches than new years eve, since people will be drunk
enough to ignore occasional glitches when I restart the router :
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 03:41:24PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> So Mark and I spent some time to figure out what the issue was with ix(4)
> based on that info I resurected the em(4) mpsafe diff that got backed out
> and I applied the same fix. It is somewhat unclear if this fixes the
> watchdog ti
On 11.12.2015. 10:47, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/12/15(Sat) 15:41, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> So Mark and I spent some time to figure out what the issue was with ix(4)
>> based on that info I resurected the em(4) mpsafe diff that got backed out
>> and I applied the same fix. It is somewhat unclear
On 05/12/15(Sat) 15:41, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> So Mark and I spent some time to figure out what the issue was with ix(4)
> based on that info I resurected the em(4) mpsafe diff that got backed out
> and I applied the same fix. It is somewhat unclear if this fixes the
> watchdog timeouts since in th
On 5.12.2015. 15:41, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> So Mark and I spent some time to figure out what the issue was with ix(4)
> based on that info I resurected the em(4) mpsafe diff that got backed out
> and I applied the same fix. It is somewhat unclear if this fixes the
> watchdog timeouts since in theor
So Mark and I spent some time to figure out what the issue was with ix(4)
based on that info I resurected the em(4) mpsafe diff that got backed out
and I applied the same fix. It is somewhat unclear if this fixes the
watchdog timeouts since in theory the wdog timer should be stopped when
hitting th
10 matches
Mail list logo
