On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
| Additionally, i very much prefer to have as little as possible
| differecnes between expr(1) and the ksh builtin.
|
| Ehum, running the risk of looking like a
On 2011-01-15 07.43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s.
I think this is a problem.
I would expect a unix utility of this importance to work exactly the
same
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:00:04PM +0100, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-01-15 07.43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s.
I think this is a problem.
I would
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Additionally, i very much prefer to have as little as possible
differecnes between expr(1) and the ksh builtin.
Ehum, running the risk of looking like a complete fool I've got to
ask, is there actually a ksh builtin version
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
Ehum, running the risk of looking like a complete fool I've got to
ask, is there actually a ksh builtin version of expr?
I did actually double check that prior
Hi folks,
Here's a diff to expr(1) that does three things I feel make it more useful:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s. I often use expr as a quick calculator for example when
partitioning disks and such, and frequently find myself up
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s.
I think this is a problem.
I would expect a unix utility of this importance to work exactly the
same on all our platforms.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Benny Lofgren bl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant int:s
to long:s. I often use expr as a quick calculator for example when
partitioning disks and such, and frequently find myself up against the 32
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
+ Makes it 64-bit capable on 64-bit architectures by changing relevant
int:s to long:s.
I think this is a problem.
I would expect a unix utility of this importance to work exactly the
same on all our platforms.
