On Sat, 23 May 2020 15:53:05 +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Ok to commit the below change?
OK millert@
- todd
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:55:14AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
April 26, 2020 10:34 AM, "Christopher Zimmermann" wrote:
Hi,
I further developed my approach to allow running smtpd with fewer privileges.
This diff does two
things:
- always run lmtp deliveries as SMTPD_USER. The change to m
Hello, Christopher
On the right of a person who had successfully run rootless sendmail
installations for many years,
please find some comments below.
On 2020-04-26 12:30, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Thanks for giving it a thought. I'm not entirely convinced either. But
believe some thought
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:55:14AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
April 26, 2020 10:34 AM, "Christopher Zimmermann" wrote:
- always run lmtp deliveries as SMTPD_USER. The change to
mda_unpriv.c is needed, because otherwise
all mails would be delivered to SMTPD_USER.
- add two internal flag
April 26, 2020 10:34 AM, "Christopher Zimmermann" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I further developed my approach to allow running smtpd with fewer privileges.
> This diff does two
> things:
>
> - always run lmtp deliveries as SMTPD_USER. The change to mda_unpriv.c is
> needed, because otherwise
> all mails
Hi,
I further developed my approach to allow running smtpd with fewer
privileges. This diff does two things:
- always run lmtp deliveries as SMTPD_USER. The change to mda_unpriv.c
is needed, because otherwise all mails would be delivered to
SMTPD_USER.
- add two internal flags NOPRIV and
Hi,
I further developed my approach to allow running smtpd with fewer
privileges. This diff does two things:
- always run lmtp deliveries as SMTPD_USER. The change to mda_unpriv.c
is needed, because otherwise all mails would be delivered to
SMTPD_USER.
- add two internal flags NOPRIV and