Re: Proposal for changes to the event(3) documentation

2014-05-19 Thread Ted Bullock
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > What approach are you (Ted) going to take here? I still want to see event(3) continue to be a general overview of how to use the library, even with some example code > I don't fancy doing loads of relatively small commits to event(3).

Re: Proposal for changes to the event(3) documentation

2014-05-19 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hi On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:10:36PM -0600, Ted Bullock wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote: > >> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:09:03AM -0600, Ted Bullock wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Nicholas Marr

Re: Proposal for changes to the event(3) documentation

2014-05-17 Thread Ted Bullock
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:09:03AM -0600, Ted Bullock wrote: >>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Nicholas Marriott >>> wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > Yes, I think this would be nice to

Re: Proposal for changes to the event(3) documentation

2014-05-17 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:10:36PM -0600, Ted Bullock wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote: > >> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:09:03AM -0600, Ted Bullock wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Nicholas Marriott