Questions about LibreSSL

2014-04-30 Thread Gerard Vanvooren
Hello everyone, I have been following the recent LibreSSL developments quite active and would like to contribute. I have some questions: - The accelerated assembly code for the crypto, is that gonna stay? - Why not use uint32_t and uint64_t all over (incl the APIs) instead of custom XX_ULONG

Re: Questions about LibreSSL

2014-04-30 Thread Theo de Raadt
I have been following the recent LibreSSL developments quite active and would like to contribute. I have some questions: - The accelerated assembly code for the crypto, is that gonna stay? Of course. Why do you think anyone would try to break code which works? - Why not use uint32_t

Re: Questions about LibreSSL

2014-04-30 Thread Miod Vallat
Speaking for myself here, but as far as LibreSSL is concerned, I'd say my opinion has a certain weight. - The accelerated assembly code for the crypto, is that gonna stay? Yes. Including existing code for platforms OpenBSD itself does not run on (e.g. s390). - Why not use uint32_t and

Re: Questions about LibreSSL

2014-04-30 Thread Gerard Vanvooren
I have been following the recent LibreSSL developments quite active and would like to contribute. I have some questions: - The accelerated assembly code for the crypto, is that gonna stay? Of course. Why do you think anyone would try to break code which works? Because it is a huge amount