On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 07:51:24PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > What's the status on this diff?
>
> I'm waiting for review from at least one of the softraid suspects prior
> to putting this in, in case there are further cinematics to address.
Sounds like a good idea.
In the meantime, while
> What's the status on this diff?
I'm waiting for review from at least one of the softraid suspects prior
to putting this in, in case there are further cinematics to address.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:29:13AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 07:03:50AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > What is the result if root runs disklabel, and forces it to all zeros?
> >
> > If the root duid is all zeroes, then the only way to refer to the root
> > disk is to
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:03:55PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > after a prompt from stsp@ and florian@, reporting that newfs_msdos
> > fails when given an $duid.i argument, I set down to see what could be
> > going on. My test using an USB stick failed to reprdouce the problem.
> > Then I started
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 07:03:50AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > What is the result if root runs disklabel, and forces it to all zeros?
>
> If the root duid is all zeroes, then the only way to refer to the root
> disk is to use its /dev/{s,w}d* device name, as zero duids are ignored.
I like
> What is the result if root runs disklabel, and forces it to all zeros?
If the root duid is all zeroes, then the only way to refer to the root
disk is to use its /dev/{s,w}d* device name, as zero duids are ignored.
If you set a zero duid in disklabel(8), setdisklabel() in the kernel
will
Miod Vallat wrote:
> Come to think further about it, I think it is better for diskmap to
> always trust disk drivers to either :
> - not have any label (dk_label == NULL, or points to zeroed memory)
> or
> - have a valid label (duid is not zeroes).
What is the result if root runs disklabel, and
Come to think further about it, I think it is better for diskmap to
always trust disk drivers to either :
- not have any label (dk_label == NULL, or points to zeroed memory)
or
- have a valid label (duid is not zeroes).
The following diff thus relaxes the logic to always trust
dk_label->d_uid,
> after a prompt from stsp@ and florian@, reporting that newfs_msdos
> fails when given an $duid.i argument, I set down to see what could be
> going on. My test using an USB stick failed to reprdouce the problem.
> Then I started using a vnd, and that shows the issue (once in a
> while). The
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after a prompt from stsp@ and florian@, reporting that newfs_msdos
> fails when given an $duid.i argument, I set down to see what could be
> going on. My test using an USB stick failed to reprdouce the problem.
> Then I
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after a prompt from stsp@ and florian@, reporting that newfs_msdos
> fails when given an $duid.i argument, I set down to see what could be
> going on. My test using an USB stick failed to reprdouce the problem.
> Then I
Hi,
after a prompt from stsp@ and florian@, reporting that newfs_msdos
fails when given an $duid.i argument, I set down to see what could be
going on. My test using an USB stick failed to reprdouce the problem.
Then I started using a vnd, and that shows the issue (once in a
while). The feeling is
12 matches
Mail list logo
