On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:06:26PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 06:42:02PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> > To clarify, this is independent of my recent work in
> > in6_ifawithscope(), -ifa did not work with the old code, either.
> >
>
> Of course ! Sorry if my message led
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 06:42:02PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> To clarify, this is independent of my recent work in
> in6_ifawithscope(), -ifa did not work with the old code, either.
>
Of course ! Sorry if my message led to think you were responsible for it.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 05:34:09PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> While working on source selection, I noticed the IPv6 source was not honored
> when set from route(8) with -ifa.
>
> After discussing with florian@, here is a proposed change. It chooses the
> source
> address associated with the ro
While working on source selection, I noticed the IPv6 source was not honored
when set from route(8) with -ifa.
After discussing with florian@, here is a proposed change. It chooses the source
address associated with the route (hence honoring -ifa) instead of the first
address of the output interfa
