On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:05:42AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > Testing it on my X270. I get:
> > nvme0: unable to delete q, disabling
> >
> > Apart from that it seems to work (eventhough without inteldrm not very
> > helpful since I lose the disp
> We get called twice on suspend, once with DVACT_SUSPEND and once with
> DVACT_POWERDOWN. So, here is a patch that does it like in ahci.c an does
> everything in the DVACT_POWERDOWN path and nothing in the DVACT_SUSPEND
> path.
I suppose so.
> @@ -469,6 +512,11 @@ nvme_activate(struct nvme_so
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Testing it on my X270. I get:
> nvme0: unable to delete q, disabling
>
> Apart from that it seems to work (eventhough without inteldrm not very
> helpful since I lose the display).
Thanks for testing.
We get called twice on suspend, once with DVACT_SU
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:54:26PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the following diff adds the missing bits to make suspend/resuem work with
> nvme. It was done by ehrhardt@ and tested against nvme.c 1.50, but seems
> to apply cleanly.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any nvme hardware at
Hi,
the following diff adds the missing bits to make suspend/resuem work with
nvme. It was done by ehrhardt@ and tested against nvme.c 1.50, but seems
to apply cleanly.
Unfortunately, I don't have any nvme hardware at the moment in order to
test it. Is there anyone who could test it?
Cheers,
