On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 07:58:11PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:20:14 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > Our USB stack contains a hack needed for ehci(4) and ohci(4) that
> > breaks xhci(4). The diff below moves this hack in these drivers,
> > and makes it possi
> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 12:20:14 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> Our USB stack contains a hack needed for ehci(4) and ohci(4) that
> breaks xhci(4). The diff below moves this hack in these drivers,
> and makes it possible to have a working xhci(4) in GENERIC.
>
> I'd like this diff to be tes
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Our USB stack contains a hack needed for ehci(4) and ohci(4) that
> breaks xhci(4). The diff below moves this hack in these drivers,
> and makes it possible to have a working xhci(4) in GENERIC.
>
> I'd like this diff to be teste
Our USB stack contains a hack needed for ehci(4) and ohci(4) that
breaks xhci(4). The diff below moves this hack in these drivers,
and makes it possible to have a working xhci(4) in GENERIC.
I'd like this diff to be tested on as much machines as possible, because
the code path it touches is very
