Re: VLAN + bridge regression

2014-12-01 Thread Mattieu Baptiste
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Rafael Zalamena rzalam...@gmail.com wrote: Conclusion: (short answer) The problem with moving the vlan_input chunk is that we have to do tag re-insertion in some cases, might break QinQ and it looks to be a more intrusive code change than it is with this diff.

Re: VLAN + bridge regression

2014-11-13 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 12/11/14(Wed) 00:22, Rafael Zalamena wrote: The diff attached to this mail fixes the bridge output for VLANs noted in this link: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=141508025731320w=2 Now when we are doing VLAN input we check whether the VLAN is a bridge port or not, if it does then we

Re: VLAN + bridge regression

2014-11-13 Thread Rafael Zalamena
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 12/11/14(Wed) 00:22, Rafael Zalamena wrote: The diff attached to this mail fixes the bridge output for VLANs noted in this link: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=141508025731320w=2 Now when we are doing VLAN input we

VLAN + bridge regression

2014-11-11 Thread Rafael Zalamena
The diff attached to this mail fixes the bridge output for VLANs noted in this link: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=141508025731320w=2 Now when we are doing VLAN input we check whether the VLAN is a bridge port or not, if it does then we have to do nothing and just pass the packet and the