Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-02-22 Thread Anders Berggren
> Here is a diff to support the newer Broadcom chips seen in Dell and HP > servers. This was tested against a BCM57765, BCM5721, and BCM5720. I've been running the code that was brought back yesterday/today on four Dell R320s with 5720s on semi-production servers (router setup with BGP and OSPF)

Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-01-25 Thread Christian Weisgerber
David Gwynne wrote: > > It totally kills NFS performance in at least one of my usage cases. > > i believe the problem is the change to the COAL_BDS_INT values. Ooh, that sounds plausible. > the diff below reverts them to our previous values. it also includes a > few whitespace and comment fixe

Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-01-21 Thread Rick Macklem
Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > Here is a diff to support the newer Broadcom chips seen in Dell and > > HP > > servers. This was tested against a BCM57765, BCM5721, and BCM5720. > > This needs a lot of testing on ANY bge(4). The diff will most > > probably > > only apply

Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-01-21 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Claudio Jeker wrote: > Here is a diff to support the newer Broadcom chips seen in Dell and HP > servers. This was tested against a BCM57765, BCM5721, and BCM5720. > This needs a lot of testing on ANY bge(4). The diff will most probably > only apply to a very current -current. This patch is very

Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-01-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/01/18 13:35, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > Here is a diff to support the newer Broadcom chips seen in Dell and HP > > servers. This was tested against a BCM57765, BCM5721, and BCM5720. > > This needs a lot of testing on ANY bge(4). > > I already told claudio@ a

Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-01-18 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Claudio Jeker wrote: > Here is a diff to support the newer Broadcom chips seen in Dell and HP > servers. This was tested against a BCM57765, BCM5721, and BCM5720. > This needs a lot of testing on ANY bge(4). I already told claudio@ and dlg@, but for the public record: With this diff my BCM5761 n

Re: bge(4) support for BCM57{18,19,20}

2013-01-15 Thread Janne Johansson
2013/1/16 Claudio Jeker : > Here is a diff to support the newer Broadcom chips seen in Dell and HP > servers. This was tested against a BCM57765, BCM5721, and BCM5720. > This needs a lot of testing on ANY bge(4). The diff will most probably > only apply to a very current -current. > Will make my D