ok!
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.06.17 23:08:37 +0200:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:20:57PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.06.17 21:34:30 +0200:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Now that the community rewrite is in here another diff to
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:20:57PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.06.17 21:34:30 +0200:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that the community rewrite is in here another diff to make bgpd more
> > awesome. There was one loop left that did not run asynchronous
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.06.17 21:34:30 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the community rewrite is in here another diff to make bgpd more
> awesome. There was one loop left that did not run asynchronous compared to
> the main event loop. This loop was in nexthop_update() now a
Hi,
Now that the community rewrite is in here another diff to make bgpd more
awesome. There was one loop left that did not run asynchronous compared to
the main event loop. This loop was in nexthop_update() now a route server
or a big route reflector would be hit hard by this loop since it will
