On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:59:51PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff extends the existing trie code for prefix-set to also work with
> roa-set. Unlike prefix-set there is no need for a prefixlen mask during
> lookup, instead the source-as needs to be checked and also if the
> prefixlen of
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:27:03PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear Claudio,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:59:51PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This diff extends the existing trie code for prefix-set to also work with
> > roa-set. Unlike prefix-set there is no need for a prefixlen mask
Dear Claudio,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:59:51PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff extends the existing trie code for prefix-set to also work with
> roa-set. Unlike prefix-set there is no need for a prefixlen mask during
> lookup, instead the source-as needs to be checked and also if the
>
This diff extends the existing trie code for prefix-set to also work with
roa-set. Unlike prefix-set there is no need for a prefixlen mask during
lookup, instead the source-as needs to be checked and also if the
prefixlen of the prefix is allowed.
The lookup can return 3 states:
ROA_UNKNONW:
