Re: bridge(4) and ether_input_mbuf()

Applied. I don’t see any regressions so far. I use bridge+vether. //mxb > On 28 apr 2015, at 23:06, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 21/04/15(Tue) 12:35, Martin Pieuchot wrote: >> This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert >> other pseudo-drivers to if_input(). This will

Re: bridge(4) and ether_input_mbuf()

On 21/04/15(Tue) 12:35, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert > other pseudo-drivers to if_input(). This will also help bridge(4)'s > own conversion. > > Since bridge_input() already returns a mbuf, I believe this change is > less error pron

bridge(4) and ether_input_mbuf()

This diff adds the necessary glue to bridge(4) to be able to convert other pseudo-drivers to if_input(). This will also help bridge(4)'s own conversion. Since bridge_input() already returns a mbuf, I believe this change is less error prone than the carp(4) one. But I appreciate reviews, tests an