2012/11/27 Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com:
apply the diff and see how all your apps are happily using single
device node: /dev/bpf0.
i'm not 100% sure we want this but why wouldn't we?
generally speaking we also need to move to a single /dev/bpf
node, but that can be done, once this diff
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
apparently it works just fine. the number of clones is limited
by the v_specbitmap which currently allows for 64 clones total
(per system, not per process).
Please clarify: Does it mean 64 cloned bpf devices per
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com wrote:
apparently it works just fine. the number of clones is limited
by the v_specbitmap which currently allows for 64 clones total
(per system, not per
there's not supposed to be bpf0,1,2,3...
Unfortunately history argues otherwise.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
there's not supposed to be bpf0,1,2,3...
Unfortunately history argues otherwise.
no, i meant if we move to the clonable bpf, we will need only one node.
sorry for not making it clear.
apparently it works just fine. the number of clones is limited
by the v_specbitmap which currently allows for 64 clones total
(per system, not per process).
apply the diff and see how all your apps are happily using single
device node: /dev/bpf0.
thanks to pedro and thib for the spec_open_clone
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 22:17 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
apparently it works just fine. the number of clones is limited
by the v_specbitmap which currently allows for 64 clones total
(per system, not per process).
apply the diff and see how all your apps are happily using single
device
