On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:13:04PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com [2010-11-25 17:04]:
I doubt that there is a measurable performance difference on
i386/amd64.
yeah, well, doubt. pls run a quick test.
Well this was not quick but I finally finsihed
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:06 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This diff was made by oga@ some time ago -- I just fixed a few conflicts
and I would really like to see this going in.
netisr needs to be made a normal C function and
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:06AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:06 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This diff was made by oga@ some time ago -- I just fixed a few conflicts
and I would really like to see
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:30:39PM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:06AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:06 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This diff was made by oga@ some time
* Owain Ainsworth zer...@googlemail.com [2010-11-25 14:26]:
I also recall asking you (or someone with the right setup) to please do
that verification, request still stands :).
the last word on this was that you'd run them with remote access to my
test setup
be assured i had long run it if i
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:30:39 +
From: Owain Ainsworth zer...@googlemail.com
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:06AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:42:59PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:06 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This diff was
This diff was made by oga@ some time ago -- I just fixed a few conflicts
and I would really like to see this going in.
netisr needs to be made a normal C function and not this madness it
currently is. This is necessary to imporve the packet scheduling.
Tested myself on i386, amd64, sparc64,
