On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 02:25:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I did not point you in this direction, not at all.
Oh you did. It was not intentional. But I was focused on make variables
instead of trying to catch the error, and you redirected me towards
execv proper.
> I said make execve
I did not point you in this direction, not at all.
I said make execve failure report an accurate error. Rather than
requiring a special hook which will report the problem. Meaning
if the problem areas were known, they could be coped with. What
I'm seeing here appears to be a thing like
Theo pointed me in another direction
Proof of concept that appears to work just fine
(very minimal error checking so far)
Of course, if we end up running a command on somethin too large,
thi will fail as usual, but much to my surprise,
make show=_FULL_FETCH_LIST
in sysutils/telegraf worked with
