On 2016/12/05 17:21, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> Thanks; I didn't realize there'd be trouble, else I would have published
> something like this along with the change (one small mistake on my part
> below, fixing...).
Here's a sed script that seems to do the trick. Should we put it somewhere
(upgrade
On Mon 2016.12.05 at 22:16 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/12/05 21:38, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/11/26 14:57, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > >
> > > In addition, I've changed the 'bind' and 'mousebind' config options to
> > > 'bind-key' and 'bind-mouse', respectively. The 'unmap'
On 2016/12/05 21:38, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/11/26 14:57, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> >
> > In addition, I've changed the 'bind' and 'mousebind' config options to
> > 'bind-key' and 'bind-mouse', respectively. The 'unmap' option is replaced by
> > 'unbind-key' and 'unbind-mouse'. By popular
On 2016/11/26 14:57, Okan Demirmen wrote:
>
> In addition, I've changed the 'bind' and 'mousebind' config options to
> 'bind-key' and 'bind-mouse', respectively. The 'unmap' option is replaced by
> 'unbind-key' and 'unbind-mouse'. By popular request by those who customize
> everything, one can
On Wed 2016.11.30 at 18:32 +0100, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Okan Demirmen on Wed, Nov 30, 2016:
> > I suppose a future change could change the implicit 'command' binding to
> > something more explicit, such as "bind-key M-m command /usr/local/bin/magic"
> > While that requires a bit of
Quoth Okan Demirmen on Wed, Nov 30, 2016:
> I suppose a future change could change the implicit 'command' binding to
> something more explicit, such as "bind-key M-m command /usr/local/bin/magic"
> While that requires a bit of surgery, I could make that a part of this overall
> change?
Explicit
On Wed 2016.11.30 at 15:20 +0100, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Okan Demirmen on Sat, Nov 26, 2016:
> > Hopefully these new action names make more sense; they will allow adding
> > some
> > more functions that will more closely match what they do.
>
> The new action names are definitely better.
Quoth Okan Demirmen on Sat, Nov 26, 2016:
> Hopefully these new action names make more sense; they will allow adding some
> more functions that will more closely match what they do.
The new action names are definitely better. I'm a bit divided
about breaking compatibility, but it's probably
Hi cwm users,
In an effort to normalize all the bindings added over time, as well as those
now duplicated since many keyboard vs mouse bindings are now the same, the
below diff splits the bindings into a few categories: window, group, menu and
pointer. These new ones should match their actual
