On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:15:50AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:26:06PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:00:50AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 08:57:44AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:26:06PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:00:50AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > >
> > > [please do not Cc me]
> > >
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:26:06PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:00:50AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> >
> > [please do not Cc me]
> >
> > > I shouldn't have started on sending patches at 3AM. This one should do
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:00:50AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > This doesn't seem to resolve the problem that sa->rate is
> > not initialized, so a simple file like this still triggers
> Likely, this is better.
> RCS file:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:00:50AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
>
> [please do not Cc me]
>
> > I shouldn't have started on sending patches at 3AM. This one should do
> > what I intended it to do. Sorry for noise.
>
> > + else if (t
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
[please do not Cc me]
> I shouldn't have started on sending patches at 3AM. This one should do
> what I intended it to do. Sorry for noise.
> + else if (t == NULL && sa->minsz != sa->maxsz)
> + errx(1, "%s: parse
"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
>"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
>
>>"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
>>
>>>Claus Assmann wrote:
>>>
AFAICT the "percentage of disk" is optional
>>>
>>>disklabel(8) says:
>>>
>>>|
"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
>"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
>
>>Claus Assmann wrote:
>>
>>>AFAICT the "percentage of disk" is optional
>>
>>disklabel(8) says:
>>
>>| A template for the automatic allocation can be passed \
>>| to
"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" wrote:
>Claus Assmann wrote:
>
>>AFAICT the "percentage of disk" is optional
>
>disklabel(8) says:
>
>| A template for the automatic allocation can be passed \
>| to disklabel using
>| the -T option. The template consists of
Claus Assmann wrote:
>AFAICT the "percentage of disk" is optional
disklabel(8) says:
| A template for the automatic allocation can be passed to disklabel using
| the -T option. The template consists of one line per partition, with
| each line giving mountpoint,
While playing around with the autoinstaller and autodisklayout I
ran into several problems, some of which I worked around and for
one I created a possible patch, but I'm not sure if that's the right
thing to do.
I have a disklayout template like this:
/ 500M
swap1G
/tmp1G-2G
/var
11 matches
Mail list logo