Re: drop support for afs, nnpfs, and procfs from security(8)

2020-09-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Todd, Todd C. Miller wrote on Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:36:09PM -0600: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:17:36 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Does anyone think that explicitely excluding these file system >> types might still be useful, or is the following simplification >> OK? No functional change inte

Re: drop support for afs, nnpfs, and procfs from security(8)

2020-09-16 Thread Todd C . Miller
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:17:36 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Does anyone think that explicitely excluding these file system > types might still be useful, or is the following simplification > OK? No functional change intended. I think those bits can go. OK millert@ - todd

drop support for afs, nnpfs, and procfs from security(8)

2020-09-16 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, by chance, i noticed that security(8) is careful to avoid scanning filesystems of the types "afs", "nnpfs", and "procfs". According to "ls /sbin/mount*", no such file systems are supported, and the only page "man -ak any=afs any=nnpfs any=procfs" brings up seems to be sshd_config(5) talking a