Re: em(4) towards multiqueues

2020-02-18 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 18/02/20(Tue) 22:39, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:28:20PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > @@ -2597,13 +2635,6 @@ em_initialize_receive_unit(struct em_sof > > E1000_WRITE_REG(>hw, ITR, DEFAULT_ITR); > > } > > > > - /* Setup the Base and Length of the

Re: em(4) towards multiqueues

2020-02-18 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 06:28:20PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > This diff introduces the concept of "queue" in the em(4) driver. The > logic present in ix(4) has been matched for coherency. > > Currently the driver uses a single queue and the diff below doesn't > change anything in that

Re: em(4) towards multiqueues

2020-02-16 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 14.2.2020. 18:28, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I'm running this on: > > em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03: msi > em0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "Intel I354 SGMII" rev 0x03: msi > > More tests are always welcome ;) em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel 82579LM" rev

em(4) towards multiqueues

2020-02-14 Thread Martin Pieuchot
This diff introduces the concept of "queue" in the em(4) driver. The logic present in ix(4) has been matched for coherency. Currently the driver uses a single queue and the diff below doesn't change anything in that regard. It can be viewed as the introduction of an abstraction. I'd like to