Re: fix multiple iwm/iwx interfaces

2022-03-19 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 14:18:14 +0100 > From: Stefan Sperling > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:03:36PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14 2022, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > It is currently impossible

Re: fix multiple iwm/iwx interfaces

2022-03-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:03:36PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14 2022, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > It is currently impossible to use more than one iwm or iwx interface > > > in a system because I don't

Re: fix multiple iwm/iwx interfaces

2022-03-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14 2022, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > It is currently impossible to use more than one iwm or iwx interface > > in a system because I don't understand C. > > > > Trying to bring up an uninitialized interface

Re: fix multiple iwm/iwx interfaces

2022-03-16 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Mar 14 2022, Stefan Sperling wrote: > It is currently impossible to use more than one iwm or iwx interface > in a system because I don't understand C. > > Trying to bring up an uninitialized interface anyway results in a > kernel panic ("bogus channel pointer" from net80211), so prevent >

fix multiple iwm/iwx interfaces

2022-03-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
It is currently impossible to use more than one iwm or iwx interface in a system because I don't understand C. Trying to bring up an uninitialized interface anyway results in a kernel panic ("bogus channel pointer" from net80211), so prevent the device from being used in case we never managed to