Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Regarding ftp(1), it would be nice to get more eyes on sunil@'s rewrite,
> apart from anything else it fixes problems with some servers (like
> ftp.tug.org)
> that don't work with the existing code..
Hi,
For folks on tech@, the latest code is at https://nimmagadda.net/
Regarding ftp(1), it would be nice to get more eyes on sunil@'s rewrite,
apart from anything else it fixes problems with some servers (like ftp.tug.org)
that don't work with the existing code..
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:02:14PM +1300, richard.n.proc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Theo Buehler wrote:
>
> > In cleanup_url_get, fin and s will be closed a second time, so mark them
> > as invalid after closing them the first time.
> >
> > Another option might be to remove t
On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, Theo Buehler wrote:
> In cleanup_url_get, fin and s will be closed a second time, so mark them
> as invalid after closing them the first time.
>
> Another option might be to remove the fclose/close calls, but since this
> happens right before the recursive call, I'm not sure
In cleanup_url_get, fin and s will be closed a second time, so mark them
as invalid after closing them the first time.
Another option might be to remove the fclose/close calls, but since this
happens right before the recursive call, I'm not sure whether this might
run the risk of hitting limits.
