On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 08:19:47PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> this is basically the same as what i did for in_pcbselsrc, and
> completely mechanical. im too tired to figure out if there's a smarter
> way to do it.
>
> lightly tested, and more eyes are welcome because of the tiredness
> thing.
this is basically the same as what i did for in_pcbselsrc, and
completely mechanical. im too tired to figure out if there's a smarter
way to do it.
lightly tested, and more eyes are welcome because of the tiredness
thing.
Index: in6_pcb.c
