> Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:42:27 +
> From: Miod Vallat
>
> When asking for the backtrace of a secondary processor in ddb, if that
> backtrace reaches the secondary cpu startup code before the
> switch_trampoline call, it will trust uninitialized stack data and is
> likely to panic with an
When asking for the backtrace of a secondary processor in ddb, if that
backtrace reaches the secondary cpu startup code before the
switch_trampoline call, it will trust uninitialized stack data and is
likely to panic with an unaligned access at db_stack_trace_print+0x1d0.
(this was found the hard