On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:15:31AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 11/12/20(Fri) 19:17, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Here's another sleep that doesn't need lbolt.
> >
> > The idea here is to call apm_periodic_check() once a second.
> > We can do that without lbolt.
> >
> > Is there some other
On 11/12/20(Fri) 19:17, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Here's another sleep that doesn't need lbolt.
>
> The idea here is to call apm_periodic_check() once a second.
> We can do that without lbolt.
>
> Is there some other address that would be more appropriate for this
> thread to sleep on? It doesn't
Here's another sleep that doesn't need lbolt.
The idea here is to call apm_periodic_check() once a second.
We can do that without lbolt.
Is there some other address that would be more appropriate for this
thread to sleep on? It doesn't look like any apm(4) code calls
wakeup(9) on lbolt so I've
