On 1 June 2016 at 17:46, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:47:45PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 1 June 2016 at 13:33, Patrick Wildt wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The IPv6 address assignment was basically copied from the IPv4
>> > code. Instead of working on the last 32-bits, it
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:47:45PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 1 June 2016 at 13:33, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The IPv6 address assignment was basically copied from the IPv4
> > code. Instead of working on the last 32-bits, it actually worked
> > on the fourth byte. Thus it modi
On 1 June 2016 at 13:33, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The IPv6 address assignment was basically copied from the IPv4
> code. Instead of working on the last 32-bits, it actually worked
> on the fourth byte. Thus it modified the network bits instead of
> the host bits.
>
> This diff fixes the co
Hi,
The IPv6 address assignment was basically copied from the IPv4
code. Instead of working on the last 32-bits, it actually worked
on the fourth byte. Thus it modified the network bits instead of
the host bits.
This diff fixes the code so that we can have at least a 32-bit
address pool space b
