List: openbsd-tech
Subject:impact of unaligned partitions/slices on 4kB sector drives
(wd10ears)
From: Robert robert () openbsd ! pap ! st
Date: 2010-01-06 22:54:34
Message-ID: 20100106235434.55963d32 () openbsd ! pap ! st
Hello,
i did some measurements on the impact
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 03:43:23AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
(( If you read this far, have a cookie
and wonder with me about that quick extraction...
The system this drive is in has the same board,
but everything else is slower and not idle when meassured...))
On 14/05/2011, at 6:43 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
I'm starting to get angry about the _horrible_ performance on this drive
(WD10EARS-00Y), some developer ever got a chance to see something about
this?
don't get angry, it's just a disk.
we changed the default alignment of
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
i have had a look at querying disks for their physical and logical block
alignments and offsets, but the the WD??EARS-00? drives dont report this info.
according to western digital, the next generation of these drives
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:15:51AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
i have had a look at querying disks for their physical and logical block
alignments and offsets, but the the WD??EARS-00? drives dont report
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:15:51AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
i have had a look at querying disks for their physical and logical block
