> From: "Todd C. Miller"
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:33:23 -0600
>
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:50:44 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > IMO we should just delete CLOCK_VIRTUAL from sys/_time.h and
> > clock_gettime(2)
>
> Easy enough.
ok kettenis@
> Index: sys/sys/_time.h
> ===
On 2014/10/16 07:33, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:50:44 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > IMO we should just delete CLOCK_VIRTUAL from sys/_time.h and
> > clock_gettime(2)
>
> Easy enough.
ports should be pretty much OK with this, if there's any breakage it
will be minor and
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:50:44 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> IMO we should just delete CLOCK_VIRTUAL from sys/_time.h and clock_gettime(2)
Easy enough.
- todd
Index: sys/sys/_time.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/sys/sys/_tim
> Am 16.10.2014 um 06:50 schrieb Philip Guenther :
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Todd C. Miller
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:53:47 +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:37:26AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
Since this came up in another thread. Trivial
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Todd C. Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:53:47 +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:37:26AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>> > Since this came up in another thread. Trivial implementations of
>> > CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF, modeled
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:53:47 +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:37:26AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > Since this came up in another thread. Trivial implementations of
> > CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF, modeled after what FreeBSD does.
> >
>
> out of curiousity, what
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:37:26AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Since this came up in another thread. Trivial implementations of
> CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF, modeled after what FreeBSD does.
>
out of curiousity, what program needs these?
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:04:43 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Oh, and while FreeBSD seems to implement CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF
> as per-process, Solaris implements them as per-thread (but doesn't
> document them). And on Solaris CLOCK_PROF is just an alias for
> CLOCK_
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:18:10 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Shouldn't this do a tuagg() on all the threads of the process like we
> do for getrusage? Otherwise the CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF clocks
> will only be updated upon a context switch.
Probably. I wasn't 100% sure going the rusage rout
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:36:33 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Hmm, looking at the FreeBSD man page... isn't CLOCK_PROF the same
> thing as CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID?
I was wondering that too, but I get different results as they are
not calculated the same way. CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID always yields
he CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF clocks
> > will only be updated upon a context switch.
> >
> > Also, you should add support for these to clock_getres(2).
> >
> > Oh, and documenting CLOCK_PROF in the man page would be good.
>
> Hmm, looking at the FreeBSD man page...
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:18:10 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > From: "Todd C. Miller"
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:37:26 -0600
> >
> > Since this came up in another thread. Trivial implementations of
> > CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF, modeled after what FreeBSD does.
>
> Shouldn't
> From: "Todd C. Miller"
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:37:26 -0600
>
> Since this came up in another thread. Trivial implementations of
> CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF, modeled after what FreeBSD does.
Shouldn't this do a tuagg() on all the threads of the process like we
do for getrusage? Otherwi
Since this came up in another thread. Trivial implementations of
CLOCK_VIRTUAL and CLOCK_PROF, modeled after what FreeBSD does.
- todd
Index: sys/sys/_time.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/sys/sys/_time.h,v
retrieving revision
14 matches
Mail list logo
