Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> >> * Change the misleading argument placeholder "portnumber" to "service";
> >>even the default ("rsync") isn't a number. In the description,
> >>mention services(5), and also mention the default.
>
> > I don't object, but I wonder how much detail is needed.
Hi Christian,
Christian Weisgerber wrote on Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:13:27AM +0200:
> Ingo Schwarze:
>> here are serveral bugfixes and improvements for the rsync(1) manual.
> ok
Thanks for checking, committed with the following tweaks:
> I have some comments, but I think you should commit
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > * Remove excessive verbosity from -g and -o, and improve precision:
>
> I find "Set the group name to match the source" incomprehensible.
> The example given in the previous text may be unelegant, but it helps
> me understand what this actually does,
Yes,
Ingo Schwarze:
> here are serveral bugfixes and improvements for the rsync(1) manual.
>
> OK?
ok
I have some comments, but I think you should commit this. Further
tweaks can follow later.
> Missing information:
> * Change the misleading argument placeholder "portnumber" to "service";
>
Hi,
here are serveral bugfixes and improvements for the rsync(1) manual.
OK?
Ingo
Bugfixes:
* For -D and -l: s/Transfer/Also transfer/.
* In the EXAMPLES, the renaming rsync -> openrsync caused a mess;
the worst aspect is the --rsync-path in the last example.
I don't have a good