On October 10, 2022 12:45:09 AM GMT+02:00, Klemens Nanni
wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:56:57PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> While I dislike the ">/dev/null 2>&1" sledgehammer, this is in the right
>> direction.
>
>Agreed.
>
>We should be fine silencing only the test condition which
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:56:57PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> While I dislike the ">/dev/null 2>&1" sledgehammer, this is in the right
> direction.
Agreed.
We should be fine silencing only the test condition which produces legit
output and warnings.
All else produces no output and should
On October 4, 2022 10:11:46 PM GMT+02:00, Klemens Nanni
wrote:
>This function's style is a bit off: it wraps the body in a subshell to
>discard all stdout/err at once, but a still uses return inside it.
>
>1. A command list (using {}) would be enough here as it groups like a
> subshell but
This function's style is a bit off: it wraps the body in a subshell to
discard all stdout/err at once, but a still uses return inside it.
1. A command list (using {}) would be enough here as it groups like a
subshell but avoids spawning another shell;
2. discarding stdout/err at the end of an
