On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:48:48PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> OK?
I did a regress run with witness. OK bluhm@
> 8<---8<---8<--8<
> diff --git a/sys/net/pf_ioctl.c b/sys/net/pf_ioctl.c
> index dbbc79c0a0e..329284ce6a6 100644
> ---
update pf(4) configuration simultaneously. I think this subtle
change is not desired.
in order to keep behavior same I'd like to introduce pfioctl_rw,
which only purpose is to synchronize simultaneous ioctl(2) operations
on pf(4).
bluhm@ poked into cvs history already. There used to be pf_consiste
