ok mvs@
> On 11 Dec 2021, at 22:03, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:53:35AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> To cache lookups, the policy ipo is linked to its SA tdb. There
>> is a list of SAs that belong to a policy. To make it MP safe we
>> need a mutex around these poi
On 12.12.2021. 16:37, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 11.12.2021. 20:03, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:53:35AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>>> To cache lookups, the policy ipo is linked to its SA tdb. There
>>> is a list of SAs that belong to a policy. To make it MP safe we
>
On 11.12.2021. 20:03, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:53:35AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> To cache lookups, the policy ipo is linked to its SA tdb. There
>> is a list of SAs that belong to a policy. To make it MP safe we
>> need a mutex around these pointers.
>>
>> Hrvoje
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:53:35AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> To cache lookups, the policy ipo is linked to its SA tdb. There
> is a list of SAs that belong to a policy. To make it MP safe we
> need a mutex around these pointers.
>
> Hrvoje: Can you test this alone and together with the ip
Hi,
To cache lookups, the policy ipo is linked to its SA tdb. There
is a list of SAs that belong to a policy. To make it MP safe we
need a mutex around these pointers.
Hrvoje: Can you test this alone and together with the ip forwarding
diff. I protects the data structure where the latter crash