On 2011 Jul 27 (Wed) at 19:22:34 +0200 (+0200), Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while
> > > (0)
> >
> > use
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while
> > (0)
>
> userland is not supposed to use nitems I think? But it keeps sneaking
> in because the kernel hea
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while
> > (0)
>
> userland is not supposed to use nitems I think? But it keeps sneaking
> in because the kernel he
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while (0)
userland is not supposed to use nitems I think? But it keeps sneaking
in because the kernel headers don't protect it.
Hi,
This diff (original version from nicm@) adds resolving of systcl
numbers to names. e.g.:
914 sysctl CALL __sysctl(hw.pagesize,0x8443e4,0x7f7bb8b8,0,0)
914 sysctl RET __sysctl 0
utrace(2) wil not make release due to ABI/API lock. But this can make
if I get reviews and ok's,
