* Alexander Bluhm [2011-04-03 19:38]:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:49:09PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > lo has that link1 wankery where it kind of replies to all addresses in
> > the subnet, except that it doesn't really - it is very halfbaked and
> > gets in the way. unless somebody has a VER
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:49:09PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> lo has that link1 wankery where it kind of replies to all addresses in
> the subnet, except that it doesn't really - it is very halfbaked and
> gets in the way. unless somebody has a VERY convincing reason to keep
> this it'll be gon
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:56:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> all the things i can imagine using this for, i can do with pf features.
>
> ok.
>
Fine with me.
> On 02/04/2011, at 10:49 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > lo has that link1 wankery where it kind of replies to all addresses in
> > t
all the things i can imagine using this for, i can do with pf features.
ok.
On 02/04/2011, at 10:49 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> lo has that link1 wankery where it kind of replies to all addresses in
> the subnet, except that it doesn't really - it is very halfbaked and
> gets in the way. unless
lo has that link1 wankery where it kind of replies to all addresses in
the subnet, except that it doesn't really - it is very halfbaked and
gets in the way. unless somebody has a VERY convincing reason to keep
this it'll be gone in a few.
we'll be able to use the fast rb tree lookup in in_aiwithadd
